From: Andrew Dunbar (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Jul 06 2002 - 22:57:49 EDT
--- Alan Horkan <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >
> Is there not a more generic way to import unknown
Actually I don't know but these are not unknown tags.
As a first implementation we can treat them as "do
nothing" tags. Later on we'll do the right thing
> And while you are looking at this part of the code i
> was wondering if
> abiword allows/preserves tags of the form <? blah ?>
> or if <!-- comments
> survive intact -->
> i have been meaning to test this out for myself but
> got distracted...
That's a good question and my bet is that we don't
preserve such things. Whether we ought to is open
> Alan Horkan
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 08:27:59 +0100 (BST)
> From: "[iso-8859-1] Andrew Dunbar"
> To: AbiWord <email@example.com>
> Subject: Re: Commit (HEAD): Fix HTML plugin
> --- "j.m.maurer" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> wrote: > Fix typo that broke the build
> Sorry about that. I have CVS but no compiler.
> I'm trying to do some work on Bug 3662.
> I've added new tags <ruby>, <rt>, and <rp>.
> For now we need to treat them just as <span> and
> accept all text inside them without doing anything
> We're currently ignoring anything inside them which
> results in dataloss in documents that use ruby.
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 06 2002 - 23:02:00 EDT