Re: Locale choice

Subject: Re: Locale choice
From: Pierre Abbat (
Date: Fri Mar 02 2001 - 21:38:40 CST

>Likewise, if es-ES is missing, you may be willing to make do with either
>another es-* (we don't have any yet), or perhaps another *-ES (we have two
>of those). Still, chances are that you *really* want es-ES.

Not necessarily. If es-ES is missing, you would be far more likely to
understand pt-PT than eu-ES.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Mar 02 2001 - 21:45:38 CST