For now: Why not just filter on 'abiword-user' ? Does the domain
really matter?
--On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 08:59:38AM -0400, Arcady Genkin wrote: > Return-Path: <owner-abiword-user@sourcegear.com> > Received: (from majordomo@localhost) > by postman.sourcegear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA04624 > for abiword-user-outgoing; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 09:45:05 -0500 > Received: from smtp13.bellglobal.com (smtp13.bellglobal.com [204.101.251.52]) > by postman.sourcegear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04620 > for <abiword-user@abisource.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 09:45:04 -0500 > Received: from main.wgaf.net (HSE-TOR-ppp22881.sympatico.ca [209.226.71.171]) > by smtp13.bellglobal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA27037 > for <abiword-user@abisource.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 08:56:57 -0400 (EDT) > Received: from antipode by main.wgaf.net with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) > id 11EBVC-0000Gt-00; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 08:59:38 -0400 > To: abiword-user@abisource.com > Subject: Re: This list setup > References: <87so5sk59n.fsf@main.wgaf.net> <37AF73B8.90CB9D9E@periscope-systems.freeserve.co.uk> <87btcgjw4g.fsf@main.wgaf.net> <37B01559.73C1E945@periscope-systems.freeserve.co.uk> > From: Arcady Genkin <a.genkin@utoronto.ca> > Date: 10 Aug 1999 08:59:38 -0400 > In-Reply-To: Jonathan Masters's message of "Tue, 10 Aug 1999 13:04:41 +0100" > Message-ID: <877ln3eqpx.fsf@main.wgaf.net> > User-Agent: Gnus/5.070095 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.95) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Sender: owner-abiword-user@sourcegear.com > Precedence: bulk > Content-Length: 1377 > Lines: 35
> Jonathan Masters <mastersj@periscope-systems.freeserve.co.uk> writes: > > > correctme if I'm wrong but each message is addressed via > > "abiword-user@abiword.com" so filter by that! > > No, actually, like I wrote in my first message, there are already 4 > addresses via which messages are sent to this list. Namely: > > abiword-user@abisource.com > abiword-user@sourcegear.com > abiword-user@postman.sourcegear.com > abiword-user@abiword.org > > I did have a filter setup for the official addy, but then discovered > some mailings ended up in my Junk mailbox, because they were addressed > to some other address. I grew kinda tired of adding yet another alias > for this list. > > Besides, some messages are sent directly to this address, some are > CC'ed. And if one will be Bcc'ed, then none of my rules will stand, > because the addy won't show in the header at all. > > Here are some examples from other mailing lists which all have some > sort of unique identification: > > ("x-mailing-list" "wm-user" "mail.WindowMaker") > ("x-mailing-list" "debian-user" "mail.Debian") > ("x-mailing-list" "exim-announce@exim.org" "mail.Exim-Announce") > ("x-beenthere" "exim-users@exim.org" "mail.Exim-Users") > ("delivered-to" "freebsd-questions" "mail.FreeBSD-Questions") > > -- > Arcady Genkin > "... without money one gets nothing in this world, not even a certificate > of eternal blessedness in the other world..." (S. Kierkegaard)
-- Eric W. Sink, Software Craftsman SourceGear Corporation eric@sourcegear.com