Re: Gtk2 vs Gtk3

From: Jean Brefort <jean.brefort_at_normalesup.org>
Date: Mon Dec 19 2011 - 17:16:53 CET

Le lundi 19 décembre 2011 à 07:34 -0800, Hub Figuière a écrit :
> On 11-12-19 2:38 AM, Jean Brefort wrote:
> >
> > It just needed more time than I could spend on it, and it will need more
> > time when we drop the gtk2 support.
>
> Actually with my refactor, it will be quite easy to drop Gtk2. Dropping
> Gtk2 means dropping Maemo, but we know how dead that platform it.
>
> > Note that we still shoukd drop all GtkTable and GtkAlignment uses in the
> > gtk3 code since they are not correctly supported (and deprecated).
>
> My changes don't reintroduce GtkTable.
>
> > About goffice-bits, it does not solve the goffice license issue, is
> > mostly unmaintained, so why not use goffice itself?
>
> Maybe we should (for gtk3)
>
> What licensing issue is it again?

GPL-v2 only: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463248

> Hub
Received on Mon Dec 19 17:17:20 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 19 2011 - 17:17:20 CET