Alan Horkan wrote:
> First off I'll say it looks quite nice, the simplicity and clarity is
> good.
>
> However I loathe frames (you seem to be using div but the effect is
> similar). Hopefully you used frames only for demonstration and did not
> intend to use them in the real version where server side includes would be
> avialable.
These are not frames. There is a DIV that stays positioned as the page
is scrolled. The effect is similar navigation and display-wise, but it
doesn't have any of the issues that made frames a poor layout choice.
Forward/Back still works as expected. Bookmarks work as expected.
Search engines will index it as expected. It's just a single HTML page.
> I'm occasionally stuck with a very slow connection and Abiword does appeal
> to users with very old crappy hardware so I hope the site wont become too
> heavy.
Other than that immense AbiWord 3.5 image (that weighs in at over 60KB)
the pages are about the same weight size-wise. It should probably be
replaced with a much lighter-weight image. We could reduce the size wih
an optimized JPG (down to 30KB) but any further and it will degrade:
http://johnhaller.com/jh/temp/abisplash.jpg
I'd also recommend making it printer-friendly. Add the following CSS:
/*printer styles*/
@media print{
#content{
width:100%;
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
#content p{
margin:0;
}
#sidebar{
display:none;
}
}
To get a feel for what this does, print preview this page:
http://johnhaller.com/jh/development/
Regards,
John
Received on Mon Jan 9 16:31:30 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 16:31:30 CET