Re: We're removed from FC2 ?

• Previous message: Rui Miguel Seabra: "[Fwd: Re: rawhide report: 20040128 changes]"
• In reply to: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: We're removed from FC2 ?"
• Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: We're removed from FC2 ?"
• Reply: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: We're removed from FC2 ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 19:25, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> So if we're getting
> removed because of an optional-optional dependency, I
> call "shenanigans" and I'm going to get my broom...

Some believe that AbiWord should go into (the still non-existing) Fedora
Extras (and not necessarily because of that dependency).

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

• application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

• Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: We're removed from FC2 ?"
• Previous message: Rui Miguel Seabra: "[Fwd: Re: rawhide report: 20040128 changes]"
• In reply to: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: We're removed from FC2 ?"
• Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: We're removed from FC2 ?"
• Reply: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: We're removed from FC2 ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jan 28 2004 - 14:39:29 EST