Re: strings to .po

Date: Mon Jan 26 2004 - 04:40:29 EST

  • Next message: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: commit (HEAD): UUID hashes"


    For me .stings are easier for translating, because I can modify .strings
    and I have result of translation at onces - "on line" (after restartnig
    Please do not remove .strings - let the scipt converts them automatically.


    Andrzej Pruszynski
    aka donkiszot -> Linux#270512

    Raphael Finkel napisał(a): > I attach a Perl script that takes a strings file and a po file (you can > use any language's po file, or generate a new one using -pot > in the po directory) and sends a new .po file to stdout. It doesn't > modify either input file, so there is no risk trying it.> > Raphael > > ----- Forwarded message from "J.M. Maurer" > <> ----- > > For translations that only are up to date in the .strings file: maybe > someone could come up with a script to turn a .strings file into a .po > file? Two different translation mechanisms is hard to maintain, and I'd > like to see the .strings files removed from CVS altogether...

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 26 2004 - 04:41:52 EST