From: Kenneth J. Davis (jeremyd_at_ctc.net)
Date: Mon Jan 12 2004 - 06:29:54 EST
>On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 22:10, msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au wrote:
>> I didn't realize that getext has these rather obnoxious clauses in it.
>uh... what clauses? AFAICT gettext is dual licensed with GPL/LGPL.
>AbiWord is licensed with GPL, so we share the same clauses (modulo the
>I guess there must be some confusion, somewhere.
Legally, gettext is licensed under the sames terms as AbiWord,
and so I was just verifying the opinions of Dom, Jordi, & Martin
regarding my interpretation of use of the MS runtime DLLs,
considering the gettext readme claims contrary to what I believe
(the FAQ entry you point to concurs with my understanding).
Dual licensed? I only see the GPL, not the LGPL in the
latest gettext tarball. I'll have to look again.
Please discontinue this thread, Dom has already responded to
my concerns. [Any further discussion should be sent to
the gettext maintainers regarding the text in their readme,
or start a new thread with appropriate title, such as the
merits or problems of switching AbiWord to use gettext.]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 12 2004 - 06:29:59 EST