Re: Preferences dialog: Not implementing options without hacks

From: Marc Maurer (j.m.maurer_at_student.utwente.nl)
Date: Fri Apr 09 2004 - 20:25:09 EDT

  • Next message: Marc Maurer: "Commit (STABLE): Re: commit (HEAD): fix 2857"

    > Uhm where should I add it? Does this mean that it's an empty
    > function/dummy implementation? Sorry, but I'm completely unfamiliar with
    > this coding style / way of thinking.

    In the place where you 'first define those functions'. And yous, this means that they are 'empty' functions when not overridden.

    Marc

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 09 2004 - 20:24:32 EDT