From: Hubert Figuiere (hfiguiere_at_teaser.fr)
Date: Mon Dec 01 2003 - 06:22:52 EST
On dim, 2003-11-30 at 12:09, msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au wrote:
> >> The performance bugs like 5880 are being addressed in CVS HEAD, since
> >> fixing them is potentially unstablizing.
> > Are they going to be backported at some stage?
> I'll leave that to Hub's excellent judgement. Early in current cycle I was
> in favour of backporting some speed improvement fixes. Hub objected and it
> turned out that there were some serious issues with that code.
> So I'm very happy to leave that judgement to Hub.
> However I also to want to point out we're only 4 months away from our
> projected 2.2.0 release so it's not like users will have to wait too long
Thanks for the hot potato.
The short reply is: we won't.
The long reply is: if someone provide a complete patch that we can test
pretty well, I'm ok to apply it.
Unlikely to be in 2.0.2 anyway.
-- "<erno> hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to ping, it works completely, I just can't figure out where in my apartment it is." -- http://www.bash.org/?5273
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2003 - 06:20:58 EST