Re: Bugs bugs bugs and AWN

From: Jesper Skov (
Date: Mon May 20 2002 - 08:08:16 EDT

  • Next message: Alan Horkan: "Re: One more question (Sorry!)"

    On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 13:41, Alan Horkan wrote:
    > > CLOSED: This state should only be used for Bugs that should never have
    > been filed originally, or for issues that are obsoleted
    > Hub explained to me that i should not close most bugs anymore, except
    > maybe after a major release. I am glad you clarified that.
    > But the AWN lists the most active QA Helpers based on people who CLOSE
    > bugs. I just figure i should have have been listed in the past few weeks
    > as i have been doing some bits and pieces (several QA verify and at least
    > one CLOSE) in bugzilla but still i dont appear on the QA helpers list even
    > when it is not full.

    No, the wording was bad. I've changed the two Closed occurences to

    As for the script, it looks for Bugs in the VERIFIED state which have
    been changed in the last 7 days, and where the Bug history shows that
    the last action was a RESOLVED->VERIFIED transition.

    The script is in CVS if you want to have a look at it. It's not perfect
    by a long shot, and I'm sure it might be missing someone from time to
    time. But I don't have the time to verify it by hand.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 20 2002 - 08:12:16 EDT