From: sam th (email@example.com)
Date: Wed May 08 2002 - 01:50:17 EDT
On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 22:11, Martin Sevior wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> It would be great to have a maintainer for the stable branch
> This person would be responsible for checking that new commits to stable
> don't cause regressions.
I think this would be an excellent position for someone to have. And, I
think that whoever takes the position should decide two things soon:
1. A calendar for 1.0.x releases. Once a month - 2 months seems about
right to me.
2. A more detailed set of criteria for what checkins are allowed on the
branch. Personally, I think that after 1.0.2, no checkins should be
allowed on the branch without branch maintainer's approval. This will
ensure the continued stability of the branch.
And we already have a volunteer. Yay!
-- sam th OpenPGP Key: CABD33FC
"Life is polynomial time." -- Laszlo Babai
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed May 08 2002 - 01:53:13 EDT