From: Hubert Figuiere (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Apr 25 2002 - 04:34:38 EDT
----- Forwarded message from email@example.com -----
To: "Tomas Frydrych" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Pango portability (or rather the lack of it)
From: Havoc Pennington <email@example.com>
Date: 24 Apr 2002 22:03:37 -0400
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
"Tomas Frydrych" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> So, the bottom line is that Pango only really works on Unix. Until
> this changes, it is not suitable for use in AW.
So you're going to reimplement over a year of debugged work by an i18n
expert and a bunch of contributors with language-specific expertise,
instead of working on fixing up the win32 port, which needs to be done
for GTK itself anyway?
And end up with a document editing area with different behavior
from your entry boxes in terms of selection, delete keys, etc.
This just doesn't make sense to me. I don't think you understand how
complex it will be to implement all this, or how hard it will be to
match the user-visible behavior that Pango presents (it will be easy
for Europe of course, but not for the hard languages).
If the Pango release cycle doesn't sync with yours then cut-and-paste
Pango for a while and keep an internal copy (ideally as pristine
tarball + namespace sed job + patch set). But there's no reason to
redo the work.
----- End forwarded message -----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 25 2002 - 04:34:42 EDT