Subject: Re: suggestion: slight optimization for UT_String
From: Dom Lachowicz (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Mar 19 2001 - 00:09:34 CST
>Has tests shown that we do that much appending? If so, I'm all for it
>(conceptually), but not implementation-wise.
Well, I'm testing some things out by rewriting the RTF and MSWord import
filters to use UT_string right now, and yes, there is a *lot* of appending
going on there because we append lots of properties to a props buffer. It
might or might not warrant this attention, but each time I append there I
guarantee that I'm appending more that 4 more chars (more like 12 chars per
append, and maybe 10 appends per character run or new paragraph crated).
Implement it how you will... I suggest maybe growing by a factor of
MAX(2*size(), size_needed). I can almost guarantee that every append will be
adding a string of similar or larger size.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Mar 19 2001 - 00:09:42 CST