Subject: Re: Strings, Was: profile results for new UT_* implementations?
From: Aaron Lehmann (aaronl@vitelus.com)
Date: Tue Jun 19 2001 - 23:50:19 CDT
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:55:05PM -0400, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> Regardless of their apparent usefulness, UT_Bytebufs are not strings. They
> don't look or behave like strings - they represent a block of memory and
> nothing more.
What makes a string any more than a block of memory, except OO
masochism (Object Obfuscation)?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Jun 19 2001 - 23:50:43 CDT