Subject: Re: zero-length runs
From: Jesper Skov (jskov@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:51:56 CST
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Rohr <paul@abisource.com> writes:
Paul> At 02:03 PM 1/22/01 +1100, Martin Sevior wrote:
>> HI Jesper, Thanks for fixing this Jesper. It makes sense to be that
>> if the insertion point is between runs we will get troubles. Since
>> we have zero length runs this is something we have to deal with. It
>> seems sensible then to move the code to search for the docpos
>> (containsOffset) into the block.
Paul> This sounds like the obvious point to insert the reminder that
Paul> zero-length runs are a hack we'd probably be better off without.
I know. I want them out too. But I keep getting distracted when I
decide to look at it. If only days were longer...
Jesper
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:52:04 CST