Subject: Re: Outstanding patches
From: Joaquin Cuenca Abela (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2001 - 00:35:45 CDT
No problem at all
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, [ISO-8859-1] Joaquín Cuenca Abela wrote:
> On 20 Aug 2001 09:52:43 -0700, Paul Rohr wrote:
> > At 05:46 PM 8/20/01 +0200, Joaquín Cuenca Abela wrote:
> > >On 20 Aug 2001 10:05:07 -0400, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> > >> Hi guys,
> > >>
> > >> All those people with outstanding patches, please resend to the list
> > that I
> > >> might check things out and review them, in hopes of ultimately
> > committing them.
> > >> Please diff against CVS head and make big patches (i.e. don't send
> > >> against your own patches).
> > >
> > >Can someone take a look at the nightly snapshots?
> > Hi Joaquín!
> > Since you're reading this thread, I figured it was fair to ask:
> > Would you be willing to resync your old Bullets and Numbering patch?
> > >From what I remember, it sounded like you were onto something really
> > but that work never saw the light of day. If that work isn't too
> > to revive, it might be worth another look.
> Hi Paul!
> To be fair, I've tried one or two times to revive this patch, but the
> task has been harder than I initially expected, mainly because the patch
> changes our xp and our unix code (it even changed some bytes of our list
> backend), and not only our unix GUI code.
> I don't like to change our xp code of the list's stuff, 'cause it will
> break win/qnx/... builds, but I will try to revive only the new GUI
I'm now not willing to let our Modeless Lists dialog go without
a lot of convincing. Having just used the Word 2000 dialog, I think our
Lists UI is much nicer and easier to use, including the Modeless Lists
You and Paul will have a lot of convincing to do.
Would you rather work on embedding or scripting Abi?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Aug 22 2001 - 00:35:19 CDT