Subject: Re: Graphic Images
From: Dom Lachowicz (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Apr 20 2001 - 09:42:12 CDT
<snip because i'm tired of responding to the same argument>
>To illustrate how non trivial this would be, ImageMagick or not, have a
>look at this book:
>it is over 1100 pages.
See http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/gdk-pixbuf/index.html. The GDKPixbuf
reference doc is about 4 pages long for what we need. IM is of similar scope
(note: for what we need)
If we choose to do things your way, we're doomed to read *at minimum*
several hundred of those 1100 pages.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm willing to say that if my case
hasn't made an impression on you @ this point (nor yours on me) it is not
worthwhile to continue these threads. Besides, it's called "Graphic Images"
for God's sake. As opposed to what, those super-spiffy non-graphic images
motto: someone else has already had this problem, and has done it better.
let's use what tools are available to us wisely
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Apr 20 2001 - 09:42:15 CDT