Subject: Re: is the windows build still broken?
From: Robert Sievers (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Jun 02 2000 - 22:11:43 CDT
At 06:41 PM 5/31/00 -0700, Paul Rohr wrote:
>Obviously, the Tinderbox script needs to be updated to get the colors right.
>However, I'm not sure that the build really *is* broken.
>It might be worth forcing a make clean on the Tinderbox host. The current
>output smells like it could just be a stale build. (Regardless of what the
>label says, I'm not sure from the logs that it actually is clobbering the
>tree between builds.)
>I'm not sure what problem you're seeing, but earlier today I successfully
>merged almost two months of changes on top of some unfinished code I had
>from early April and everything built just fine (on NT).
>motto -- CVS is a wonderful tool
I blew away my source tree and re-checked out from scratch. That seemed to
take care of it. As for tinderbox, we have two separate issues; why the
windows build is failing on dilbert, and why tinderbox isn't displaying the
right information. We are going to figure out both of those.
Open Source Evangelist
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Jun 02 2000 - 22:14:10 CDT